|

The
community plan for a Culture and Environment Centre at the site of Pyrton,
presented by Greg Rowe and Associates to the Ministry of Planning on behalf
of various local community groups in the area, has seen the Pyrton site
become a symbol of community aspirations for a place of learning, respect
and sanctuary for the Aboriginal culture so easily overlooked, neglected
and more often ridiculed in our society.
Valuable activities proposed
for the Cultural Centre amongst others, include the Daisy Bates Archive
and Research Centre, an environment and wetlands education centre, Health
Education Centre and a community and cultural precinct which would be
of benefit to the whole community.
The Pyrton site offers an opportunity
not only for local residents but for all West Australians to create a
centre of artistic and spiritual growth where we can build a sense of
connection with our environment with our history and with each other.
It is a vision which cannot encompass a prison.
The riverland is an asset to
be enjoyed by all of the people. If a prison is sited at Pyrton the people
will be denied.
The Social/Ethical Interest of Wider Community Outweighs Pecuniary
Interest of Other Parties.
With respect to Section 10
Clause 4e of the Aboriginal Heritage Protection Act 1984 "the effects
the making of a declaration may have on the proprietary or pecuniary interests
of persons other than the Aboriginals referred to in paragraph (1)(a)."
As the Town of Bassendean has
expressed interest in buying the land, and the state government has recently
offered to vest free of charge 25 hectares of the land in the Town of
Bassendean for uses it considers appropriate, the community perception
regarding pecuniary interest is;
- Once having sold the land
to the Town of Bassendean the Ministry of Justice could then afford
to relocate their proposed prison elsewhere.
- If the state government
plans to give away 25 hectares, it makes a mockery of their argument
for decisions to be made purely on pecuniary interest.
- Social and ethical costs
to the community and indeed the state in the long term of the proposed
prison as outlined in this report have not be taken into account and
may outweigh any shorterm financial gain for the Ministry of Justice.
- The Ministry of Justice
has also failed to consider issues such as the bad repair of the buildings,
the presence of asbestos and inadequate sewerage in their refurbishment
estimates. It may be that if these estimates were subject to proper
independent scrutiny, then the pecuniary interests of the Ministry of
Justice would be better served with the proposed prison being located
elsewhere.

NEXT: PHOTO
GALLERY
|